DS Kulkarni sells Fursungi belongings flouting injunctions


Even though Deepak Sakharam Kulkarni (DSK) from the DSK Group has, to this point, managed to avoid arrest, he virtually has no longer desisted from flouting government injunctions in opposition to the sale of his houses issued in connection with his offenses.

To shield the interests of the DSK traders, the police had given a list of houses that DSK was forbidden from promoting. The list has been shown to the Pune District Collector and the Director-General of Registrations. However, DS Kulkarni has seemingly started out nurturing homes stated inside the listing.

According to Pune-based Right to Information (RTI) activist Vijay Kumbhar, who’s doggedly pursuing the DSK default count, as of 19 December, DS Kulkarni offered seven acres of land listed by using the police. Notably, the sale deed has been registered regardless of a directive from the police forbidding registration of the indexed properties.

“This isn’t most effective negative to the interests of the depositors; however, it also makes nonsense of the Maharashtra Protection of Interests of Depositors (MPID) Act, 1999”, says Mr. Kumbhar.


Read More Article :

Section four of the MPID Act empowers the authorities to attach the cash and properties of such monetary institutions defrauded the depositors.

An officer of deputy collector’s rank is appointed to attach and promote houses owned by such establishments to protect the pursuits of the depositors.

DS Kulkarni became fee sheeted under the MPID Act on 28 October 2017; the police had asked the director of registrations now not to sign any sale deeds of DSK Group.

After that, the Economic Offences Wing provided the Collector’s office with a listing of homes owned by DSK and asked for a motion underneath segment four of the Maharashtra Protection of Interests of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999.

In line with the request from the Police, Additional District Magistrate Rajendra Mutha had appointed Subhash Bhagat, deputy divisional officer of Maval taluka, because of the able authority to execute these orders.

However, as DSK succeeded in selling seven acres of land in Fursungi, the query arises as to whether or not the registrar’s office had conveyed the coaching to all its workplaces.

If the instruction has been conveyed to all places of work, then how is the registration done? If now not, the character of individuals answerable for non-conveyance of the practice must be recognized. “It appears that everyone in the authorities’ machinery is bending backward to shield DS Kulkarni in preference to shield the hobbies of the belongings, consumers, and depositors,” says Mr. Kumbhar.

The police had connected info on the homes listed for movement. Subsequently, it is not viable to say that the registration was done by mistake.

After being rate-sheeted, the Bombay High Court granted DS Kulkarni meantime relief on the situation that he deposited Rs50 crore with the courtroom. Failing to deposit the amount in the stipulated time, up to 18 December, Mr. Kulkarni approached the Supreme Court, which granted him an extension as much as 19 January 2018.

Before that, after a hearing in the High Court, Mr. Kulkarni agreed to sell his residences in Satara, Ahmednagar, the DSK Dream of Fursungi, Kegan, and Solapur. However, most of these homes were mortgaged, and loans were taken. Mr. Kulkarni was then requested to provide a list of such properties unfastened from the loan, to which he responded that there were no such houses.

He also alleged that given that his bank bills have been frozen on commands from the police, this creates hurdles within the sale of houses and depositing the Rs50 crore quantity.

The High Court had asked him to offer the investigating officer information about the residences to be bought, and the courtroom would take appropriate motion. However,t Mr. Kulkarni did not deliver details of the homes at Fursungi to the government.

Although Mr. Kulkarni has been covered by arrest concerning offenses committed in Pune, he has no such protection in Mumbai and Kolhapur. Also, he has no longer applied for anticipatory bail in those two places. “Mr. Kulkarni is misusing the long rope given to him via the regulation. However, he can not accomplish that without the connivance of the various governments,” says Kumbhar.

If you’re the sufferer or served with be aware that you are the respondent in a petition for home or repeat violence, it’s far critical to right now contact an experienced crook defense or own family law legal professional acquainted with home violence or repeat violence injunctions.

As a crook defense and circle of relatives regulation attorney in Fort Lauderdale, I normally get hold of inquiries asking how a character is searching to acquire an injunction to protect against domestic or repeat violence. I created this “cheat sheet” to understand the requirements for obtaining such requests.

To attain an injunction, a man or woman (without or with the help of a crook defense or circle of relatives law attorney) must first complete an in-depth petition mentioning the motives why they are looking for an injunction. The petition can often be observed online via your neighborhood clerk of the CS internet site. The individual soliciting the request is the PETITIONER. The character presupposed to commit the act of violence is the RESPONDENT. The petitioner can also receive the petition at their county courthouse. Provided the petitioner isn’t always in an immediate chance, I would encourage the petitioner to acquire their thoughts and create a detailed summary of any acts of violence dedicated through the respondent during their relationship prior to completing the petition. Please know that the petitioner can always amend their petition later. Courthouse employees are always to be had to assist the petitioner in creating their petition. Most courthouses will provide interpreters if essential.