DS Kulkarni sells Fursungi belongings flouting injunctions

Even though Deepak Sakharam Kulkarni (DSK) from the DSK Group has to this point, managed to avoid arrest, he virtually has no longer desisted from flouting government injunctions in opposition to the sale of his houses, issued in connection along with his offenses.

To shield the interests of the DSK traders, police had given a list of houses that DSK changed into forbidden from promoting. The list has been given to the Pune District Collector and the Director-General of Registrations. However, DS Kulkarni has seemingly started out promoting homes stated inside the listing.

According to Pune-based totally Right to Information (RTI) activist Vijay Kumbhar, who’s doggedly pursuing the DSK default count, as these days as on 19th December, DS Kulkarni offered seven acres of land listed by using the police.

It is noteworthy that the sale deed has been registered regardless of a directive from the police forbidding registration of the indexed properties.

“This isn’t most effective negative to the interests of the depositors; however also makes nonsense of the Maharashtra Protection of Interests of Depositors (MPID) Act, 1999”, says Mr. Kumbhar.

Read More Article :

• Microsoft’s Office and SharePoint Store comes to India
• A Raja’s forty three-year struggle to reclaim ancestral property
• EU threatens to suspend data-sharing with the U.S. over spying reports
• Financing Cash Flow Peaks And Valleys
• Property well worth 6L gutted

Section four of the MPID Act empowers the authorities to attach the cash and properties of such monetary institutions defrauded the depositors.

An officer of deputy collector’s rank is appointed for the motive of attaching and promoting houses owned by such establishments to protect the pursuits of the depositors.

DS Kulkarni became fee sheeted under MPID Act on 28 October 2017; the police had asked the director trendy of registrations now not to sign in any sale deeds of DSK Group.

After that, the Economic Offences Wing provided the Collector’s office a listing of homes owned by DSK and asked motion underneath segment four of the Maharashtra Protection of Interests of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999.

As in line with the request from Police, Additional District Magistrate Rajendra Mutha had appointed Subhash Bhagat, deputy divisional officer of Maval taluka, because of the able authority to execute these orders.

However, as DSK succeeded in selling seven acres of land in Fursungi, the query arises as to whether or not the registrar’s office had conveyed the coaching to all its workplaces.

If the instruction has been conveyed to all places of work, then how is the registration done? And if now not, the character of individuals answerable for non-conveyance of the practice must be recognized. “It appears that every one the authorities machinery is bending backward to shield DS Kulkarni in preference to shield the hobbies of the belongings, consumers, and depositors,” says Mr. Kumbhar.

The police had connected info of the homes listed for movement. Subsequently, it is not viable to say that the registration was carried out by mistake.

After being rate-sheeted, the Bombay High Court had granted DS Kulkarni meantime relief on the situation that he deposit Rs50 crore with the courtroom. Failing to deposit the amount in the stipulated time, up to 18th December, Mr. Kulkarni approached the Supreme Court, which granted him an extension as much as 19 January 2018.

Before that, all through a hearing in the High Court, Mr. Kulkarni had agreed to sell his residences placed in Satara, Ahmednagar, the DSK Dream of Fursungi, Kegan, and Solapur. However, a majority of these homes were mortgaged, and loans were taken. Mr. Kulkarni was then requested to provide a list of such properties that are unfastened from the loan, to which he had responded that there are not any such houses.

He had additionally alleged that given that his bank bills have been frozen on commands from the police, this creates hurdles within the sale of houses and depositing the Rs50 crore quantity.

The High Court had asked him to offer the investigating officer’s information of the residences to be bought, and the courtroom would take appropriate motion. But Mr. Kulkarni did not deliver details of the residences at Fursungi to the government.

Although Mr. Kulkarni has been covered towards arrest concerning offenses devoted in Pune, he has no such protection in Mumbai and Kolhapur. Not only that, he has no longer even applied for anticipatory bail in those two places. “Mr. Kulkarni is misusing the long rope given to him via the regulation. However, he can not accomplish that without the connivance of the various government,” says Kumbhar.

If you’re the sufferer or served with be aware that you are the respondent in a petition for home or repeat violence, it’s far critical to right now contact an experienced crook defense or own family law legal professional acquainted with home violence or repeat violence injunctions.

As a crook defense and circle of relatives regulation attorney in Fort Lauderdale, I normally get hold of inquiries asking how a character is searching to acquire an injunction to protect against domestic or repeat violence. I created this “cheat sheet” to understand the requirements essential to obtain such injunctions.

To attain an injunction, a man or woman (without or with the help of a crook defense or circle of relatives law attorney) must first whole an in-depth petition mentioning the motives why they are looking for an injunction. The petition can oftentimes be observed online via your neighborhood clerk of courts’ internet site. The individual soliciting for the injunction is the PETITIONER. The character who is presupposed to commit the act of violence is the RESPONDENT. The petitioner can also receive the petition at their county courthouse. Provided the petitioner isn’t always in immediate chance, I would encourage the petitioner to acquire their thoughts and create a detailed summary of any acts of violence dedicated through the respondent during their relationship previous to completing the petition. Please word, the petitioner can always amend their petition at a later time. Courthouse employees are always to be had to assist the petitioner in creator their petition. Most courthouses will provide interpreters, if essential.